Search found 3 matches
- Thu, 2011-07-21, 17:08
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: PC and DICOM objects really sent
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4447
OK, yes it answers my question, the point being clear for specialists like you :D I suspected that at the beginning but frankly the standard describing the presentation context is not very clear concerning its impacts. Reading the Part 7 was not providing clear enough information for me. At least th...
- Thu, 2011-07-21, 15:25
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: PC and DICOM objects really sent
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4447
Thanks Michael for your quick answer. In my example the SecondaryCaptureImageStorage is the SOP class linked. Does it makes sense or do I miss something basic? Amongst the transfer syntaxes negotiated, the server accepted JPEGLossLess and LittleEndianExplicit... (PC5 and PC7) After that, when things...
- Thu, 2011-07-21, 09:50
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: PC and DICOM objects really sent
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4447
PC and DICOM objects really sent
Hi, I tried to find the answer in the standard or by googling a bit, but no clear definition was available so far. When negotiating an association, the SCU suggest a list of presentation contexts defining SOP classes supported and link them with transfer syntaxes. What shall happen if some DICOM obj...