Search found 147 matches
- Tue, 2010-04-13, 10:21
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: OB/OW VRs detection
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4372
- Tue, 2010-04-13, 10:03
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: OB/OW VRs detection
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4372
- Tue, 2010-04-13, 10:02
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: OB/OW VRs detection
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4372
- Mon, 2010-04-12, 22:51
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: OB/OW VRs detection
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4372
guys seems there is issue with OB/OW VRs detection for not encapsulated pixels. for example latest snapshot shows and sends over network RGB/YBR_FULL 8 bit pixels (7fe0,0010) as OW. easy to reproduce by dcmdump on any 8 bit image. it breaks some (stupid) viewers and can destroy pixels on BE/LE conve...
- Fri, 2010-04-09, 21:30
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: still problem with conscructSCUSCPRoles
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3031
- Thu, 2010-04-08, 23:12
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: still problem with conscructSCUSCPRoles
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3031
still problem with conscructSCUSCPRoles
it is old issue: latest snapshot (20100326) conscructSCUSCPRoles presentationCtx = (DUL_PRESENTATIONCONTEXT*)LST_Head(¶ms->acceptedPresentationContext); should check acceptedPresentationContext as it doing branch for (type == DUL_TYPEASSOCIATERQ) recommended patch is: presentationCtx = param...
- Fri, 2010-03-12, 14:55
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: New (BSD) iplementation of JPEG-LS
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4911
- Thu, 2010-03-11, 21:30
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: missing dependies in dcmtk-3.5.5_20100226 ?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7308
- Thu, 2010-03-11, 17:20
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: missing dependies in dcmtk-3.5.5_20100226 ?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7308
- Thu, 2010-03-11, 15:12
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: missing dependies in dcmtk-3.5.5_20100226 ?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7308
- Thu, 2010-03-11, 15:11
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: missing dependies in dcmtk-3.5.5_20100226 ?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 7308
missing dependies in dcmtk-3.5.5_20100226 ?
hi, i have tried to build dcmtk-3.5.5_20100226 from scratch and movescu/termscu complained about libdcmtls (.so) in Makefile.in movescu and termscu don't have link to $(DCMTLSLIBS) $(OPENSSLLIBS) i ran with modified config/Makefile.def.in with ARFLAGS = -shared -o etc flags for dymanic lib distribut...
- Thu, 2010-03-11, 00:54
- Forum: DCMJP2K
- Topic: part 2 (multicomponent transformation) dicoms
- Replies: 0
- Views: 29750
part 2 (multicomponent transformation) dicoms
guys,
did you ever see these jpeg-2000 part 2 dicoms ?
i am thinking if we need to implement support for .92/.93 syntaxes
can someone share with me at least one part 2 dicom file for testing ? or any info where i can download the data set.
Thanks!
did you ever see these jpeg-2000 part 2 dicoms ?
i am thinking if we need to implement support for .92/.93 syntaxes
can someone share with me at least one part 2 dicom file for testing ? or any info where i can download the data set.
Thanks!
- Mon, 2010-02-08, 16:48
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: XDS, XDS-I
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3109
XDS, XDS-I
Guys, mb i have posted into wrong forum but... did someone have good suggestions about integration DCMTK with IHE profiles, fo example XDS/XDS-I profile(s). I understand that it is different levels of abstractions... i checked several java implementations (dcm4che etc) and found that development und...
- Sun, 2009-12-13, 22:24
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Do I need DCMJP2K to just read pixel values of Jpeg 2000?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2866
- Thu, 2009-12-10, 22:44
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: The maximum size of the buffer allocated for storescp
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7326