Search found 147 matches
- Thu, 2009-12-10, 22:32
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Need for checking SopClassUID and SopInstanceUID while retri
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3406
it is very strange that SCU generates dynamic SOPClassUID :) 9.1.1.1.4 Affected SOP instance UID For the request/indication, this parameter specifies the SOP Instance to be stored. It may be included in the response/confirmation. If included in the response/confirmation, this parameter shall be equa...
- Thu, 2009-12-10, 20:58
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: The maximum size of the buffer allocated for storescp
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7326
# storescu --help | grep max -pdu --max-pdu [n]umber of bytes: integer (4096..131072) set max receive pdu to n bytes (default: 16384) --max-send-pdu [n]umber of bytes: integer (4096..131072) restrict max send pdu to n bytes # storescp --help | grep max -pdu --max-pdu [n]umber of bytes: integer (4096...
- Wed, 2009-11-11, 22:11
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Last snapshot question
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8633
just to remember one ticket for dcmnet, i am not sure if you fixed it (i really think it is a bug)
viewtopic.php?t=2159
viewtopic.php?t=2159
- Wed, 2009-11-11, 22:06
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Last snapshot question
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8633
- Tue, 2009-11-10, 12:00
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Unable to read Private Tags inserted in a DICOM file
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2881
- Tue, 2009-11-10, 11:46
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Last snapshot question
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8633
- Tue, 2009-11-03, 23:38
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: socket leak in DUL_RequestAssociation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4321
- Tue, 2009-11-03, 23:30
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: socket leak in DUL_RequestAssociation
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4321
socket leak in DUL_RequestAssociation
latest snapshot (dcmtk-3.5.5_20090818) look for several calls : destroyAssociationKey(association); in some bad conditions DUL_RequestAssociation (and may be other routines) calls destroyAssociationKey and it freeing connection by if (*key && (*key)->connection) delete (*key)->connection; BU...
- Tue, 2009-10-27, 12:39
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: RET VR
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9096
- Mon, 2009-10-26, 21:08
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: RET VR
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9096
- Mon, 2009-10-26, 15:47
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: RET VR
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9096
- Tue, 2009-10-20, 19:04
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: RET VR
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9096
- Tue, 2009-10-20, 18:24
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: RET VR
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9096
- Tue, 2009-10-20, 18:15
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: RET VR
- Replies: 9
- Views: 9096
RET VR
some of old (based on malincrodt ctn etc) modalities still sends objects with "RT" value representation. that caused fail in DcmItem::readTagAndLength and, possible, crash or memory exhausted exception.
add RT if it possible and i think we need to interpretate it as UN.
add RT if it possible and i think we need to interpretate it as UN.
- Thu, 2009-09-03, 15:47
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Create a patient profile in server
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4113