Search found 21 matches
- Tue, 2005-12-27, 15:04
- Forum: DCMTK - Installation
- Topic: dcmtk 3.5.4 with GCC 3.3 on Mac OS X
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10997
dcmtk 3.5.4 with GCC 3.3 on Mac OS X
Hello there, the new dcmtk 3.5.4 compiles without any problems on Mac OS X using GCC 4.0. The previous dcmtk 3.5.3 compiled using GCC 3.3. When I try to compile 3.5.4 with GCC 3.3 instead instead of GCC 4.0, I get the following error: g++-3.3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DNDEBUG -c -I. -I. -I../include -I../../...
- Fri, 2005-12-23, 10:14
- Forum: DCMTK - Installation
- Topic: 3.5.4: configure --prefix= and dicom.dic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8347
- Thu, 2005-12-22, 16:14
- Forum: DCMTK - Installation
- Topic: 3.5.4: configure --prefix= and dicom.dic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8347
- Thu, 2005-12-22, 15:39
- Forum: DCMTK - Installation
- Topic: 3.5.4: configure --prefix= and dicom.dic
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8347
3.5.4: configure --prefix= and dicom.dic
Hello there, first of all, thanks for another great dcmtk release! And, once again, ready for christmas! I have one small question: I am building dcmtk using ./configure --prefix=/sw make install prefix=/sw mandir=/sw/share/man From looking at configure.in, it seems that the location of the dicom.di...
- Thu, 2005-11-17, 10:04
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Tag name lookup "problem"
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2856
Tag name lookup "problem"
Hello there, we recently wondered why the tag name lookup of dcmtk did not return the "correct" group/element of (0008,0008) for the ImageType tag, but instead a different private tag (0021,1010). We recently added private.dic to the builtin dictionary, and it seems that the there's a priv...
- Wed, 2005-10-19, 16:36
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp.cfg and echoscu (Verification)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3594
storescp.cfg and echoscu (Verification)
Hello there, we are using storesp (dcmtk 3.5.2) with the -xf option and a config file storescp.cfg (which is basically the default config file supplied with dcmtk 3.5.3). Now, when trying to use echoscu on this storescp, the association does not succeed with the message echoscu: No Acceptable Presen...