Search found 2049 matches
- Thu, 2009-01-29, 15:10
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp crash while receiving a corrupt dataset
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18887
Yes, that is still a problem - but i dont understand the the connection between the normal private (non-reservation) tags you posted above. But maybe I'm just too confused at the moment. By the way, I already corrected dcmdata routines so far, that they do not crash when reading such datasets. I'm n...
- Thu, 2009-01-29, 10:10
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp crash while receiving a corrupt dataset
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18887
- Tue, 2009-01-27, 16:30
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp crash while receiving a corrupt dataset
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18887
Hi, oops, then my colleague just forgot to mark that in the TODO list :-) But ok, even better that it's already done. what do you think about (0009-o-ffff,0010-u-00ff) LO PrivateCreator 1 PRIVATE if private creator will place SQ to that range instead of LO ? for example (0507, 0011) Thats illegal in...
- Tue, 2009-01-27, 15:47
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp crash while receiving a corrupt dataset
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18887
Hi, thank you for sending. It's actually about the PrivateGroupLengthToEnd attribute which is part of the dicom.dic. As another team member (Marco) already pointed out in our TODO list, this attribute (and also IllegalGroupLengthToEnd and GenericGroupLengthToEnd) will probably removed from dicom.dic...
- Tue, 2009-01-27, 11:38
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp crash while receiving a corrupt dataset
- Replies: 16
- Views: 18887
- Tue, 2009-01-27, 11:35
- Forum: DCMTK - Installation
- Topic: Compiler Warnings on VS2005
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5917
Hi Ofek, thank you for the hint. We always try to keep all compilers quiet during compilation; in earlier times we did that mainly when preparing a realease (*sigh*), so, at the moment we do only fix warnings occassionally. For the warning you reported, a fix was already applied a few months ago, th...
- Thu, 2009-01-22, 18:36
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Memory Leaks.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3839
- Thu, 2009-01-22, 17:37
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Memory Leaks.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3839
- Mon, 2009-01-19, 16:00
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Include mdfdsman.h and mdfdsman.cc in debian devel packages
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2989
Hi, mdfdsman.cc/h are not meant to be part of the dcmdata library. They are there because of some stupid dcmodify source code structuring which may change in the future. Thus, they are and will not be copied when installed. I guess there is no good reason for the Debian people to change that behavio...
- Mon, 2009-01-05, 09:33
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Dcmtk OFSting text codec
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6077
Hi, no, the only way to find out which character sets might be used for querying the SCP is trying it out or looking into the conformance statement of the PACS. Also, please note that the Specific Character Set attributes only denotes what is sent. Thus the returned character set may be different fr...
- Thu, 2008-12-18, 11:16
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: segmentation fault - saveFile
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5380
- Wed, 2008-12-17, 18:15
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: segmentation fault - saveFile
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5380
- Wed, 2008-12-17, 17:27
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: segmentation fault - saveFile
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5380
Hi Miklos,
first check whether loading the file was successful by checking the return value. See dcmdata documentation for an example.
Regards,
Michael
first check whether loading the file was successful by checking the return value. See dcmdata documentation for an example.
Regards,
Michael
- Wed, 2008-12-17, 10:42
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: How to improve movescu performance?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11550
Hi, From my observation from the processing details, it seems that the bottleneck is the time wasted in waiting for Status=Pending. Please note that all C-MOVE-RSP message are only very small messages sent to movescu about what is happening on the _second_ connection, ie. to let movescu know how man...
- Tue, 2008-12-16, 13:44
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: How to improve movescu performance?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11550
Hi, sorry, I don't have any further ideas - your movescu call looks fine. So you want the PACS (AETitle D250GEPACS, IP 170.215.245.168, Port 4100) to send the study to another DICOM device (not movescu itself), with AETitle MYPACS01. What you (of course) must check is whether that MYPACS01 receiver ...