Search found 347 matches
- Wed, 2021-08-11, 15:27
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Building without libwrap on FreeBSD
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3179
Re: Building without libwrap on FreeBSD
DCMTK build correctly, but now my programs returns this: ld: error: undefined symbol: locale_charset >>> referenced by ofchrenc.cc >>> ofchrenc.cc.o:(OFCharacterEncoding::getLocaleEncoding()) in archive /home/informemedico/dcmtk/dcmtk-3.6.2/lib/libofstd.a >>> referenced by ofchrenc.cc >>> ofchrenc.c...
- Wed, 2021-08-11, 15:01
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Building without libwrap on FreeBSD
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3179
Re: Building without libwrap on FreeBSD
Now I'm building dcmtk with:
Let's see what happens.
Code: Select all
CXX=clang++70 CC=clang70 cmake -DDCMTK_WITH_WRAP=OFF .
- Wed, 2021-08-11, 14:42
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Building without libwrap on FreeBSD
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3179
Building without libwrap on FreeBSD
Hi, I'm trying to build a program that uses dcmnet on FreeBSD12.2 To build dcmtk 3.6.2 I used: CXX=clang++70 CC=clang70 cmake . make Everything built without issues, then I tried to compile my program, that requires dcmnet, dcmdata and a couple more libraries and got this: ld: error: undefined symbo...
- Sat, 2019-08-03, 19:56
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: No SOPInstanceUID for Series?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1655
No SOPInstanceUID for Series?
I'm doing some C-Find commands against a GE PACS (Centricity) and found this funny results. When I query for series I get this: findscu -v --study -k 0008,0052=SERIES -k 0020,000D=1.2.840.113619.2.452.3.1678428672.149.1564403906.381 -k 0020,000E -k 0008,0060 --aetitle SCPAET --call GEPACS 10.100.0.4...
- Mon, 2019-05-27, 14:28
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Simplify output of dcmsend, findscu and movescu
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2536
Re: Simplify output of dcmsend, findscu and movescu
Thank you for your (feature) request. findscu already has various --extract options for extracting the C-FIND response datasets to various formats, including DICOM and XML. I don't think that it makes sense to add further output formats since all DCMTK tools are basically meant as sample programs t...
- Mon, 2019-05-27, 13:35
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: Simplify output of dcmsend, findscu and movescu
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2536
Simplify output of dcmsend, findscu and movescu
Hi, I use findscu, dcmsend and movescu from shell scripts, they of course work, but parsing its output is quite complicated. Is there a possibility in future versions to add an "--output-as-json" option to those tools to let them output results as JSON to easy it's parsing?. Regards, Leona...
- Mon, 2019-05-20, 12:18
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
Apart from this today I installed Conquest, but got the same results, so, aparently the problem is not server side?,
- Mon, 2019-05-20, 01:09
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
Today I did a comparison between storescp 3.6.4 and storescp 3.5.4 and found the older is much slower than the newer, almost 10 seconds slower.
All tests performed between my laptop at home sending a file to the Digital Ocean's droplet.
All tests performed between my laptop at home sending a file to the Digital Ocean's droplet.
- Wed, 2019-05-15, 12:21
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
Ok, using iperf this are the results: Server: ------------------------------------------------------------ Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default) ------------------------------------------------------------ [ 4] local BBB.YYY.ZZZ.AAA port 5001 connected with XXX.YYY....
- Tue, 2019-05-14, 20:08
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
BTW, I did the test against a virtual machine running on a standard i7 PC on a remote location and it took the same time storescp and scp, so, it looks like the problem is on the Digital Ocean (and Vultr) droplets.
- Tue, 2019-05-14, 20:03
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
Well, I don't know. How can I check that on Linux (Ubuntu 16.04 Server).J. Riesmeier wrote: ↑Tue, 2019-05-14, 19:52 Did you already check what the maximum throughput of your network connection is (i.e. theoretically). Maybe, your "scp" tool compresses the transferred file by default,
- Tue, 2019-05-14, 16:23
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
Today I used a Pynetdicom SCP program to test this issue and got the same results (dicom transfer much slower than scp), so it's not a problem of DCMTK.
Anyway, if someone has any idea how to track this issue I'll be glad to hear.
Leonardo.
Anyway, if someone has any idea how to track this issue I'll be glad to hear.
Leonardo.
- Mon, 2019-05-13, 20:01
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
J. Riesmeier wrote: ↑Mon, 2019-05-13, 19:38 You could also call "cmake -L | fgrep CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE" to see the build type.
Thanks, it returned "CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release"
- Mon, 2019-05-13, 19:28
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
BTW, I built dcmtk with
This generates a release or debug version?, if mine is a debug version can it be the cause of the slowness?.
Code: Select all
cmake . && make
- Mon, 2019-05-13, 19:22
- Forum: DCMTK - General
- Topic: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
- Replies: 27
- Views: 15886
Re: storescp much slower than scp (copy through ssh)
Weird, because I did a test against two different servers (one Digital Ocean and other Vultr) and both gave very similar results 12 seconds for scp and 22 seconds for dcmsend.